References

Atwater, Brian F. 1987. “Evidence for great Holocene earthquakes along the outer coast of Washington state.” Science 236 (4804): 942–44. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.236.4804.942.

Azoulay, Pierre, Christian Fons-Rosen, and Joshua S. Graff Zivin. 2019. “Does Science Advance One Funeral at a Time?” American Economic Review 109 (8): 2889–920. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161574.

Becker, Keir, James A. Austin, Neville Exon, et al. 2019. “Fifty Years of Scientific Ocean Drilling.” Oceanography 32 (1): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2019.110.

Beven, Keith, and Jim Freer. 2001. “Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology.” Journal of Hydrology 249 (1–4): 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8.

Boiko, Daniil A., Robert MacKnight, Ben Kline, and Gabe Gomes. 2023. “Autonomous chemical research with large language models.” Nature 624: 570–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06792-0.

Boudreau, Kevin J., Eva C. Guinan, Karim R. Lakhani, and Christoph Riedl. 2016. “Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science.” Management Science 62 (10): 2765–83. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285.

Burke, Peter. 2020. The Polymath: A Cultural History from Leonardo da Vinci to Susan Sontag. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300250022/the-polymath/.

Chen, Ziru, Shijie Chen, Yuting Ning, et al. 2025. “ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discovery.” International Conference on Learning Representations. https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/hash/f12b4df26344f3be803c06b555252efe-Abstract-Conference.html.

Cleland, Carol E. 2002. “Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science.” Philosophy of Science 69 (3): 474–96. https://doi.org/10.1086/342455.

Dellsén, Finnur. 2016. “Scientific progress: Knowledge versus understanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56: 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.01.003.

Flake, Jessica K., and Eiko I. Fried. 2020. “Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 3 (4): 456–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393.

Fontana, Magda, Martina Iori, Fabio Montobbio, and Roberta Sinatra. 2020. “New and atypical combinations: An assessment of novelty and interdisciplinarity.” Research Policy 49 (7): 104063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104063.

Hardwig, John. 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge.” The Journal of Philosophy 88 (12): 693–708. https://doi.org/10.2307/2027007.

Karaca, Koray. 2013. “The Strong and Weak Senses of Theory-Ladenness of Experimentation: Theory-Driven versus Exploratory Experiments in the History of High-Energy Particle Physics.” Science in Context 26 (1): 93–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889712000300.

Kitcher, Philip. 1990. “The Division of Cognitive Labor.” The Journal of Philosophy 87 (1): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026796.

Lindsey, Nathaniel J., T. Craig Dawe, and Jonathan B. Ajo-Franklin. 2019. “Illuminating seafloor faults and ocean dynamics with dark fiber distributed acoustic sensing.” Science 366 (6469): 1103–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay5881.

Lindsey, Nathaniel J., Horst Rademacher, and Jonathan B. Ajo-Franklin. 2020. “On the Broadband Instrument Response of Fiber-Optic DAS Arrays.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 125 (2): e2019JB018145. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018145.

Machado, Diogo. 2026. “Generative AI bias against scientific novelty: a cautionary tale from a small-sample evaluation of research proposals.” Scientometrics, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-026-05792-x.

Messeri, Lisa, and M. J. Crockett. 2024. “Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research.” Nature 627: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0.

Messick, Samuel. 1995. “Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning.” American Psychologist 50 (9): 741–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741.

Moore, Willard S. 2025. “The Serendipity of Discovery: Life of a Geochemist.” Annual Review of Marine Science 17: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-050823-103645.

Nelson, Alan R., Ian Shennan, and Antony J. Long. 1996. “Identifying coseismic subsidence in tidal-wetland stratigraphic sequences at the Cascadia subduction zone of western North America.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 101 (B3): 6115–35. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JB01051.

Nosek, Brian A., Charles R. Ebersole, Alexander C. DeHaven, and David T. Mellor. 2018. “The preregistration revolution.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (11): 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114.

Oreskes, Naomi, Kristin Shrader-Frechette, and Kenneth Belitz. 1994. “Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences.” Science 263 (5147): 641–46. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5147.641.

Petersen, Alexander M., Felber Arroyave, and Fabio Pammolli. 2025. “The disruption index suffers from citation inflation: Re-analysis of temporal CD trend and relationship with team size reveal discrepancies.” Journal of Informetrics 19 (1): 101605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101605.

Platt, John R. 1964. “Strong Inference.” Science 146 (3642): 347–53. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3642.347.

Powell, Richard C. 2007. “The Rigours of an Arctic Experiment: The Precarious Authority of Field Practices in the Canadian High Arctic, 1958–1970.” Environment and Planning A 39 (8): 1794–811. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38294.

Rassenfosse, Gaétan de, Kyle Higham, and Orion Penner. 2022. “Scientific rewards for biomedical specialization are large and persistent.” BMC Biology 20 (1): 221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01400-5.

Shibayama, Sotaro, Deyun Yin, and Kuniko Matsumoto. 2021. “Measuring novelty in science with word embedding.” PLOS ONE 16 (7): e0254034. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254034.

Steinle, Friedrich. 1997. “Entering New Fields: Exploratory Uses of Experimentation.” Philosophy of Science 64 (S4): S65–74. https://doi.org/10.1086/392587.

Sykes, Lynn R. 1967. “Mechanism of earthquakes and nature of faulting on the mid-oceanic ridges.” Journal of Geophysical Research 72 (8): 2131–53. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ072i008p02131.

Tukey, John W. 1962. “The Future of Data Analysis.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33 (1): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704711.

Uzzi, Brian, Satyam Mukherjee, Michael Stringer, and Ben Jones. 2013. “Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact.” Science 342 (6157): 468–72. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240474.

Wang, Jian, Reinhilde Veugelers, and Paula Stephan. 2017. “Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators.” Research Policy 46 (8): 1416–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006.

Wilson, J. Tuzo. 1965. “A New Class of Faults and their Bearing on Continental Drift.” Nature 207: 343–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/207343a0.

Wright, Dustin, Sarah Masud, Jared Moore, et al. 2025. What and Whose Knowledge? Measuring Epistemic Diversity in Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04226. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04226.

Wu, Lingfei, Dashun Wang, and James A. Evans. 2019. “Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology.” Nature 566: 378–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9.

Wu, Wenqing, Yi Zhao, Yuzhuo Wang, et al. 2026. “NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment.” Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026, 32103–33. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1607.

Yaqub, Ohid. 2018. “Serendipity: Towards a taxonomy and a theory.” Research Policy 47 (1): 169–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.007.